How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16!

April 11th, 2006 | By: Afshin Afshar | 7 Comments »

Shocking!

Bob in his Big Question asks how the World Cup can be improved. He offers a few possibilities, and they are all good. But I want to add another one, and then run for cover!

I say roll the clock back to the days that we had only 16 countries qualifying! Yes, reduce the number of teams that participate in the World Cup.

Who cares about all these boring games between countries which don’t even have a legitimate professional league?

Let’s be honest, would you be watching an Iran game this summer if you were not Portuguese, Mexican, or Angolan, or you did not have a bunch of Iranian friends? Of course not!

I tell you right now; I would not care to watch at least a quarter of the games in the group stage. I’ll watch them only they will be the best show on TV this summer, which is in itself a sad statement for the state of TV programming these days.

Doubling the number of teams was nothing but a money making ploy by FIFA.

How many of you remember Saudi Arabia vs. Morocco in 1994? Not many, unless you are a Saudi or Moroccan.

Come on! Reduce the quantity and give me more quality please!



Related Posts


Subscribe
 

rss icon Iran World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16! digg:How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16! newsvine:How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16! reddit:How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16! fark:How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16! Y!:How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16! stumbleupon:How can the World Cup be Improved? Go back to 16!

Comments
Username By Luis Carlos | April 11th, 2006 at 2:47 am
top comment
cornercorner

Wow:

I mean you said it. Iran is only in the World Cup, because their are 32 teams. That is an insult to Uruguay, Nigeria, Cameroon, and all the other great teams that didn’t make it.

Lets move the numbers to 40!!!! That way, we can see Brazil B team in the world cup

Je

Posted from Mexico Mexico

cornercorner
Username By plashch | April 11th, 2006 at 5:35 am
top comment
cornercorner

I remember Saudi Arabia vs. Morocco very well. It featured an off-the-scale 20 minutes or so by Morocco’s left winger Ahmed Bahja, who turned his defender inside out about a million times, and set up a goal for Mohammed Chaouch. A classic performance, and I wouldn’t have missed it for the world.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
top comment
cornercorner

[...] Over on the Iran blog, my fellow blogger Afshin Afshar thinks the World Cup needs to return to its 16 team format. Says he: “Who cares about all these boring games between countries which don’t even have a legitimate professional league?” [...]

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Afshin Afshar | April 11th, 2006 at 8:56 am
top comment
cornercorner

Luis Carlos: Maybr, maybe not! Iran was there in 1978 when there were only 16 teams in the World Cup.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Afshin Afshar | April 11th, 2006 at 8:59 am
top comment
cornercorner

plashch: I was there in the The Meadowlands (Giant stadium) watching the game that day, and I don’t care to remember much of it! I also watch Bulgaria beat Germany there. I still remember most of it!

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By plashch | April 11th, 2006 at 2:26 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Hi, Afshin. I’ll allow that Bulgaria-Germany was a more memorable game than Saudi Arabia-Morocco. Remember, though, it was a quarterfinal, played at a more dramatic stage of the tournament. My point is that even the obscure games have moments of brilliance, moments that those who watch will remember. (And conversely, games with better-known teams can be dreadful. The worst World Cup game I’ve ever seen was between England and Ireland in 1990.)

I prefer 32 to 16 because football excellence has expanded to the point where 16 leaves out too many good sides. Right now I’d say the ideal number is around 24, but as we know that leads to a very awkward tournament setup. Given the choice, I’d rather be more inclusive. You never know when another Ahmed Bahja performance will turn up.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Bob | April 11th, 2006 at 2:49 pm
top comment
cornercorner

I like having a 32 team field. It gives me a reason to learn about places like Angola and Togo. Generally speaking the top teams advance to the round of 16 any way. Why not let the minnows have their moment in the sun? Great upsets can be more exciting than a match between two favorites anyway.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Afshin Afshar | April 11th, 2006 at 2:56 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Hi plashch and Bob: We all know that there is no winning formula. Your points are all well taken.
plashch: I have a confession to make. I went to that game heavily favoring Morocco and was upset to see them loose. So perhaps I would have rememberd the game much better if it had turned out my way! ;)

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

Iran Club Football News

DID YOU KNOW? Mexico was one of eight seeded teams ...
Price: $35.99

Powered by

More Asia Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog